Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
August 20, 2017, 05:34:54 AM
Home Home Help Calendar Login Register
News:

Please support BullpupForum.com sponsors!!
. . . Midwest Industries . . . BullpupArmory.com . . . Shooting Sight . . . BullpupUnlimited.com . . . Homeland Guns . . . . . . . . . . . . AB Arms . . . GallowayPrecision.com . . . K & M Arms . . . . . . Geissele Automatics
+  BULLPUP FORUM
|-+  Bullpup Rifles (Auto & Semi-Auto Centerfire)
| |-+  IWI Tavor & X-95
| | |-+  Tavor Trigger Shootout: Geissele, Shooting Sight, Timney, & Factory
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] Print
Author Topic: Tavor Trigger Shootout: Geissele, Shooting Sight, Timney, & Factory  (Read 70380 times)
jack1518
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 21



« Reply #120 on: December 30, 2016, 07:26:35 PM »

You can install the lightning bow yourself, I did and it wasn't difficult.  I did buy the IWI Barrel removal wrench for that and followed a You Tube video on my laptop.  It wasn't difficult.
Logged

Blessed be the LORD, my rock, who trains my hands for war, and my fingers for battle.  Psalm 144:1
wbpo5l
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 39


« Reply #121 on: December 31, 2016, 08:47:21 PM »

I'm sure after spending more time with the rifle the trigger feel will become more evident. Today was my first session with my new x95. I never did shoot a Tavor so I have no frame of reference. But the stock trigger on the x95 is not bad at all for what it is intended to be.

Having a hard time justifying the cost of a proper trigger upgrade when there are other things you would want to do to make this a "trigger upgrade worthy" rifle in my opinion.  Like making it a fully floated barrel for one.

That said, I'm totally happy with my x95 as it sits for what it is intended to be.
Logged
Rastoff
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 164



WWW
« Reply #122 on: January 02, 2017, 01:53:58 PM »

I have held off installing the Giessele Trigger Bow and may find a IWI certified armorer.
You don't need a certified armorer. I've done this and it took me all of 15 minutes and that was really taking my time. The included instructions are very good. It might seem intimidating because it seems like you're removing a lot of parts, but once you've done it you'll see that it's not that much.

The hardest part is adjusting the slack. Even so, that's easy.
Logged

Remember, you can post here because they died over there.
Freedom isn't free.
BakerBug
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 8


« Reply #123 on: January 03, 2017, 12:55:20 PM »

Yesterday was my first range day with the Geissele Super Sabra.  I'm really sorry I waited so long to get it.  It was as if I had a brand new rifle.
Logged
Hit Factor
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 33


« Reply #124 on: January 05, 2017, 02:05:19 PM »

Anyone having trouble with the Super Sabra  hammer being too high when cocked. The problem is you can't reassemble after field stripping. Must remove sear pack to get the bolt back in. Also bolt hold open doesn't stay in place once magazine is removed.  

I sent a couple emails to Geissele,  no answer. I'll have to call them.

« Last Edit: January 06, 2017, 12:37:10 PM by Hit Factor » Logged
1154
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 21


« Reply #125 on: March 18, 2017, 01:14:08 AM »

I've been avoiding this issue, but will fire out my post.

The 'offended' customer Aug556shooter is actually Paul McCain, better known as Amsdorf, who was banned from this forum, and about a half dozen other gun forums, including FNForum and Arfcom, as well as a bunch of church forums, because he is a troll who enjoys posting inflammatory responses, and then launching personal attacks against responders.

He rejoined, not because he asked for re-admission, but because he faked his identity.

So yes, I rejected his order because I recognized who he was, and want nothing to do with him.  His postings suggesting he was hurt because I offered no explanation were because as soon as I rejected his order he EXACTLY knew the reason, but didn't share that because it didn't fit his narrative.

He has since been re-banned from this forum.

So yes, I stand behind my product, and will go to great lengths to make a customer happy.  But I will not abide trolls.



^Greatness.  Well done, Sir.
Logged
Grizz
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 149


« Reply #126 on: March 26, 2017, 03:04:05 PM »

Great thread!!

I think I'll start with the trigger bow on my x95 and see what that gets me
Logged
Grizz
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 149


« Reply #127 on: April 07, 2017, 04:10:04 PM »

Put the bow in and what a difference!!! I really like! It was too windy to even set up targets but I did get to put 30 rnds down range and the trigger was 100% better
Logged
SemiAuto9
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 47


« Reply #128 on: May 18, 2017, 07:50:47 PM »

Just got a X95....what would folks recommend? Bow trigger? Geissele trigger pack? Both? Neither?
Logged
MarkB
Sr. Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 255



« Reply #129 on: May 18, 2017, 08:22:32 PM »

Try it stock first.  then you will get to know what you need. 
Logged
vawinds4
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 23


« Reply #130 on: June 16, 2017, 03:44:22 PM »

Have a Geissele Super Sabra trigger pack and Lightning Bow Trigger on new X-95 300BO. Confirmed 3.5 #'s using Wheeler Trigger Pull Gauge. As nice as any Timney and Geissele SSA/SSA-E's upgrades on my AR's. Very happy with it.
 
Logged
The Heretic
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 95


« Reply #131 on: June 24, 2017, 12:17:44 PM »

maybe old news?

http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2016/01/01/death-trigger-pack-timney-tavor-bites-dust/
Logged
ColdDeadHand
.
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 193


« Reply #132 on: July 29, 2017, 05:04:26 PM »

maybe old news?

http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2016/01/01/death-trigger-pack-timney-tavor-bites-dust/

Reading his theory about why the hammer broke I can see how this could happen with a Canadian TAR-21 because of the different bolt carrier.  The Timney trigger pack was designed to work with the American SAR rifles.



Logged
ShootingSight
.
Bullpup Fanatic
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 518



WWW
« Reply #133 on: August 03, 2017, 08:28:37 AM »

This is one of the risks of using less expensive cast parts versus RPS (Rolled Plate Steel) which is CNC machined.  ShootingSight does not use castings in any trigger components.

When steel is cast, there are possibilities of inclusions or micro bubbles being trapped in the steel, there are also possibilities that carbon or other alloying agents were not perfectly mixed in, so you get clumps or stringers in the casting .... all of these are weak points where cracks can initiate.

When steel plate is rolled from an ingot, the flow of the solid steel squishes (for lack of a more technical term) these defects out, so the resulting steel not only has smaller grains, but they are more homogeneous.  This means there will be fewer internal defects in the steel, and you are less prone to fatigue failure.

It is normal for castings to undergo magnaflux inspection, which try to identify internal defects before the parts leave the production facility, but some still slip through.  At ShootingSight, the number of cracked hammers we have had since we started selling triggers, including all the ones we found internally, plus the ones that consumers have sent back to us is ..... zero.  We use Rolled Plate Steel, and cracked parts is not an issue.  Google 'cracked xxxxx hammer' (insert just about any competitor's name for xxxxx), and pictures will pop up of cast parts.
Logged

Art Neergaard
ShootingSight LLC
www.shootingsight.com
shootingsight@fioptics.com
513-702-4879
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] Print 
Jump to:  



Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!