Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 12, 2021, 07:58:31 PM
Home Home Help Calendar Login Register
News:

Please support BullpupForum.com sponsors!!
. . . Midwest Industries . . . BullpupArmory.com . . . Shooting Sight . . . BullpupUnlimited.com . . . Homeland Guns . . . . . . . . . . . . Desert Tech . . . GallowayPrecision.com . . . K & M Arms . . . . . . Geissele Automatics
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10

 1 
 on: Today at 07:39:30 PM 
Started by wfadams - Last post by boscoman
The bolts are not modified and will work with any of the barrel lengths interchangeably. IWIís position is the bolt is checked for correct headspace with the barrel at the factory and itís a ďmatchedĒ set thatís why the bolt/barrels were not sold separately. The only difference between the x95 5.56 RH carriers/bolts is the ejector configuration. Single pin or 2 pin. The 2 pin is the newer one and believe it was an IDF reliability upgrade.  Other than that there is no other difference and are interchangeable between barrel lengths. Only thing is the correct head space. I believe the above is also correct for left hand ejection set ups also. Iíve swapped my single pin and double pin bolts against both my barrels and checked with headspace gauges and they were fine. There are slight differences in the newer bolt carriers as I think the 5.56 is now using a .300BO configuration just to simplify the carrier being used on both calibers. Do not think they have changed the bolts except for the 1/2 pin ejectors and they all work across the new vs older carriers.

Thanks for the info. Good to know.

 2 
 on: Today at 07:07:34 PM 
Started by wfadams - Last post by DubageL
The bolts are not modified and will work with any of the barrel lengths interchangeably. IWI’s position is the bolt is checked for correct headspace with the barrel at the factory and it’s a “matched” set that’s why the bolt/barrels were not sold separately. The only difference between the x95 5.56 RH carriers/bolts is the ejector configuration. Single pin or 2 pin. The 2 pin is the newer one and believe it was an IDF reliability upgrade.  Other than that there is no other difference and are interchangeable between barrel lengths. Only thing is the correct head space. I believe the above is also correct for left hand ejection set ups also. I’ve swapped my single pin and double pin bolts against both my barrels and checked with headspace gauges and they were fine. There are slight differences in the newer bolt carriers as I think the 5.56 is now using a .300BO configuration just to simplify the carrier being used on both calibers. Do not think they have changed the bolts except for the 1/2 pin ejectors and they all work across the new vs older carriers.

 3 
 on: Today at 02:45:52 PM 
Started by davidm - Last post by davidm
That would be great. Thanks Frozen!


 4 
 on: Today at 02:15:24 PM 
Started by davidm - Last post by FrozenIceman
Yes, I will see what I can do to get some images to you by the weekend.

 5 
 on: Today at 02:06:57 PM 
Started by davidm - Last post by davidm
I think being the 5.56 model, you have a removable mag-well insert in there.  Which means you have a two component wall that the catch has to pass through.  I don't know what that is supposed to look like or if that ever posses a problem. Based on various other reports, I'm not aware that it typically is a problem.
No, you remove the 223 magwell adapter for the 308 conversion.

Can you guys see my pictures?

 6 
 on: Today at 01:51:28 PM 
Started by davidm - Last post by LazyEngineer
I think being the 5.56 model, you have a removable mag-well insert in there.  Which means you have a two component wall that the catch has to pass through.  I don't know what that is supposed to look like or if that ever posses a problem. Based on various other reports, I'm not aware that it typically is a problem.

 7 
 on: Today at 09:51:42 AM 
Started by Jwill - Last post by Jwill
I don't get on here often but if you pm me I get a notification in my email anyone who has the file can distribute it also if they so choose.

 8 
 on: Today at 09:29:40 AM 
Started by davidm - Last post by davidm
Hey guys, can one of you take a look at your rifle for me?

Even if you can't take a picture, just let me know if it looks like this.

Thanks

 9 
 on: Yesterday at 08:53:47 PM 
Started by pidg133 - Last post by whiskey91lima
DT in particular grossly overpriced everything.

 10 
 on: Yesterday at 08:05:43 PM 
Started by reason - Last post by Disgruntled Bpfcom User
Are you sure?  The target would also be magnified 6x so it would essentially be a wash since the magnifier is magnifying everything you see by a similar amount.

Either way, the EOTech was a huge help with a much more precise dot (with more granular brightness adjustment!) than the old LED image from my Steiner

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!